Value
7.3/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 3.7 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 31.5x
- ▸PEG: 0.21
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
NeoGenomics is an oncology diagnostics company trading at a compelling 18% potential upside relative to analyst price targets, but weak quality metrics and an unfavorable risk/reward profile at current levels make the investment speculative until margin improvement materializes.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
NeoGenomics generates positive free cash flow with a Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9, signaling strong balance-sheet health even amid thin margins, and analysts see roughly 36% upside to their consensus target. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow margin improves above 6% and revenue growth accelerates above 10% over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterOperating and net margins are near zero, and FCF yield of 2.3% is too thin to support meaningful reinvestment or shareholder returns. | ||
NeoGenomics has beaten or matched earnings estimates in each of the last three reported quarters, with an average surprise of over 200%, suggesting consistent execution versus investor expectations. Earnings | The company continues to meet or beat consensus EPS in the next two quarterly reporting periods. | →Stable |
| CounterThe outsized average surprise is distorted by a single 800% beat, and underlying beat consistency is not established over a long track record. | ||
With a PEG ratio of 0.21 and a forward P/E of 30x, NeoGenomics is priced at a moderate premium to growth that appears justified if earnings continue to expand, making it attractively valued relative to its growth trajectory. Valuation breakdown | Earnings growth sustains above 20% annually so the PEG ratio remains below 0.5 over the next year. | →Stable |
| CounterA forward P/E of 30x is expensive in absolute terms for a company with near-zero operating margins and a sub-$2B market cap. | ||
The stock's current risk/reward setup shows only 18% upside against 15% downside, and the momentum score of 4.6 is barely above the minimum threshold, limiting near-term entry conviction. Warnings | Price momentum score rises above 5.5 and the asymmetry ratio climbs above 1.5 within 12 months as earnings improve. | →Stable |
| CounterRSI at 70 signals near-term overbought conditions, and falling on-balance volume indicates distribution rather than accumulation. | ||
CounterOperating and net margins are near zero, and FCF yield of 2.3% is too thin to support meaningful reinvestment or shareholder returns.
CounterThe outsized average surprise is distorted by a single 800% beat, and underlying beat consistency is not established over a long track record.
CounterA forward P/E of 30x is expensive in absolute terms for a company with near-zero operating margins and a sub-$2B market cap.
CounterRSI at 70 signals near-term overbought conditions, and falling on-balance volume indicates distribution rather than accumulation.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 3.7 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 4.6 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 8.6 |
| FCF quality | 3.9 |
| Moat | 5.8 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 5.3 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.4 |
| MACD | 8.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 10.0 |
| vol acceleration | 8.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 6.9 |
| Price target | 7.3 |
| erm sentiment | 6.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.1 |
| quality rank | 1.8 |
| growth rank | 4.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.0 |
| support resistance | 0.2 |
| 52w position | 8.8 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.2 |
| days to cover | 6.3 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 7.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 4.0 |
| debt equity | 8.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 7.5 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupRECOVERY — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 73
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — Beta 1.81>1.3, MCap $1.5B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Momentum at 8.2 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:0.1<1.5@spot.
The strongest dimensions are Momentum at 8.2, Catalyst at 8.1, and Growth at 7.7; the weakest are Technical at 3.5, Quality at 3.5, and Peer rank at 3.6. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.10 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifFree cash flow margin falls below 2% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in at least 2 of the next 3 quarters.
Trip ifForward P/E rises above 40x without a corresponding increase in earnings growth above 30%.
Trip ifPrice drops below $10.31 stop-loss level or RSI rises above 80 without subsequent pullback.