Value
7.3/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.8 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.4 |
| Fwd P/E | 5.3 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 24.1x
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Nabors Industries trades at trailing earnings metrics that look attractive but masks a forward P/E of 28x versus trailing 7x — a 3.8x ratio that signals earnings are expected to fall roughly 73% from current levels — while the stock sits below the analyst price target and shows weak price momentum, creating a challenging setup for new buyers.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Free cash flow represents only 28% of net income, indicating significant cash leakage between reported earnings and actual cash generation, which limits the company's ability to service its debt or return capital despite the apparently low trailing earnings multiple. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow conversion improves to at least 70% of net income within the next 12 months as capital expenditure normalizes. | →Stable |
| CounterCapital-intensive drilling businesses routinely show FCF below reported earnings during expansion phases; the low conversion ratio may reflect productive investment rather than earnings quality problems. | ||
The forward P/E of 28x versus the trailing P/E of 7x implies that earnings are expected to decline approximately 73% from their current level, consistent with a cyclical peak in oil and gas drilling activity that will compress Nabors' profitability as rig demand normalizes. Warnings | Forward earnings estimates stabilize or rise, reducing the forward P/E below 15x, which would indicate that the cyclical decline is less severe than currently projected. | →Stable |
| CounterIf oil prices remain elevated and rig count holds, the consensus earnings decline forecast may prove far too pessimistic, and the trailing P/E of 7x could prove to be the better valuation anchor. | ||
Nabors has beaten analyst consensus EPS estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters, including by 921% and 117% in two recent quarters, suggesting that management is guiding conservatively or that rig utilization has been more resilient than the market expects. Earnings | The company beats consensus estimates in at least 2 of the next 4 quarterly reports, disconfirming the depth of the cyclical earnings decline. | →Stable |
| CounterLarge positive surprises relative to deeply negative consensus estimates can reflect how difficult it is to forecast energy services earnings rather than genuine operational outperformance. | ||
A put-to-call ratio of 1.60 indicates that options market participants are positioned more bearishly than bullishly on the stock, reflecting institutional hedging against further downside in drilling activity. Options | The put-to-call ratio falls below 1.0 within 6 months as the cyclical outlook improves, signaling a shift in options market sentiment. | →Stable |
| CounterElevated put-to-call ratios can also reflect covered call writing by long-term holders locking in gains, which would be constructive rather than bearish. | ||
CounterCapital-intensive drilling businesses routinely show FCF below reported earnings during expansion phases; the low conversion ratio may reflect productive investment rather than earnings quality problems.
CounterIf oil prices remain elevated and rig count holds, the consensus earnings decline forecast may prove far too pessimistic, and the trailing P/E of 7x could prove to be the better valuation anchor.
CounterLarge positive surprises relative to deeply negative consensus estimates can reflect how difficult it is to forecast energy services earnings rather than genuine operational outperformance.
CounterElevated put-to-call ratios can also reflect covered call writing by long-term holders locking in gains, which would be constructive rather than bearish.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.8 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.4 |
| Fwd P/E | 5.3 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 7.4 |
| ROA | 2.3 |
| Gross margin | 3.9 |
| Op margin | 2.5 |
| Net margin | 3.7 |
| Current ratio | 6.9 |
| FCF quality | 2.3 |
| Moat | 6.1 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 8.1 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 8.6 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.9 |
| quality rank | 7.2 |
| growth rank | 5.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 9.1 |
| support resistance | 9.0 |
| 52w position | 4.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.6 |
| days to cover | 7.7 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 8.6 |
| implied vol | 2.5 |
| beta | 7.3 |
| debt equity | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 8.0 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLnone
SetupUNKNOWN — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — MCap $1.2B<$5B
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.8 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Technical at 7.6) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:2.6<4.5, ASYMMETRY:1.1<1.5@spot) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 1.09 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Technical at 7.6, Value at 7.3, and Sentiment at 6.2; the weakest are Momentum at 2.6, Growth at 4.1, and Quality at 4.9. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.09 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifForward P/E rises above 40x as earnings estimates are revised downward by more than 30%.
Trip ifReported EPS comes in below consensus in more than 2 of the next 4 quarterly reports.
Trip ifFree cash flow conversion falls below 15% of net income for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifPut-to-call ratio rises above 2.5, signaling significantly increased bearish positioning.