Skip to main content
MANHManhattan Associates, Inc.Sell5.2·$129.73-0.87%
MANH · Why this verdict

Why Manhattan Associates (MANH) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.2/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Manhattan Associates is a high-quality software franchise with a wide economic moat, excellent cash conversion, and a four-quarter earnings beat streak averaging 12% positive surprise — but a rich 24x forward multiple, a confirmed technical downtrend including a death cross, and soft growth combine to make the risk/reward only marginally above the threshold, warranting patience for a better technical setup.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

At a forward P/E of roughly 24x and a PEG ratio of 1.77, the valuation assumes above-average future growth, yet both revenue and earnings growth are currently soft — a mismatch the market will resolve either by the business growing into the multiple or by re-rating the stock lower.

Stable
Bear case
Expectation
EPS grows more than 15% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters, demonstrating the growth trajectory that justifies the current multiple.

CounterSoftware businesses with wide moats and high renewal rates can sustain premium multiples for extended periods even at moderate growth, if they retain pricing power and strong customer retention.

The business earns approximately 20% operating margins, converts free cash flow at 136% of net income, and possesses a wide economic moat — a combination of durable competitive advantage and strong cash generation that underpins the premium the market attaches to the stock.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Operating margin holds above 18% and FCF-to-net-income conversion stays above 100% for 4 consecutive quarters, confirming the quality is structural.

CounterEven a high-quality franchise with a wide moat can de-rate if growth decelerates below expectations, and the current forward multiple leaves limited cushion for any operational disappointment.

The company has beaten consensus EPS estimates in all four of the last four quarters, with an average positive surprise of approximately 12%, suggesting a pattern of consistently under-promising and over-delivering.

Stable
Catalyst breakdown
Expectation
The beat streak extends to at least 6 consecutive quarters with average surprise remaining above 5%.

CounterA forward multiple of roughly 24x partly prices in recurring beats — any quarter where results merely meet rather than beat expectations may trigger a disproportionate selloff.

The stock is trading below its 200-day moving average with the average declining at -6.2% per 30 days, and a death cross has formed — a technical configuration that historically increases near-term downside risk and can extend selling pressure even for fundamentally strong businesses.

Stable
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
Price recovers above the 200-day moving average and sustains above it for at least 30 consecutive days, signaling a trend reversal.

CounterVolume accumulation (rising OBV) suggests buyers are active beneath the price weakness, which can precede a technical recovery before the moving averages formally confirm it.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

4.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E3.4
P/S5.5
EV/EBITDA0.0
Fwd P/E5.9
PEG4.9
Analyst target7.5
  • Forward P/E: 22.0x
  • PEG: 1.60

Quality

8.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE10.0
ROA10.0
Gross margin7.2
Op margin9.2
Net margin9.8
Current ratio4.3
FCF quality9.5
Moat8.4
Piotroski F7.8
  • Excellent ROE: 96%
  • Strong margins: 20%
  • Excellent cash conversion: 136% FCF/NI
  • Wide economic moat

Growth

2.8/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth4.3
EPS growth1.3

Momentum

2.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI3.0
MACD0.0
OBV10.0
MA position1.0
Volume0.0
  • Capitulation risk (RSI 18, below 200MA)
  • Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • Below 200-MA, MA slope -6.5%/30d — confirmed downtrend

Sentiment

7.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating7.0
Price target9.2
erm sentiment4.5
  • Analyst upside: 42%

Insider

5.0/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.1
  • Insider selling (low materiality) — $1,163,295 (0.015% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

3.3/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank2.6
quality rank8.5
growth rank2.1
  • Superior ROE vs peers

Technical

6.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger8.4
support resistance9.1
52w position0.5

Risk (lower is worse)

5.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest6.9
days to cover6.0
volatility0.8
put call5.1
implied vol3.0
max pain risk7.0
beta7.2
debt equity8.9
  • High IV: 62%
  • Concentration risks: 2 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

7.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg8.6
  • Perfect beat streak: 4Q

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (6)
  • ASYMMETRY:2.5>=1.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:26d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (3)
  • MOMENTUM:2.8<4.5
  • DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
  • 8K_SERIOUS:2.05
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
2.49
Upside
+23.2%
Downside
9.3%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupFALLING_KNIFE Death cross, below all MAs, RSI 18, MACD bearish

EdgeTEMP_HEADWIND High quality (8.5) with weak momentum (2.8)

SuitabilityMODERATE Balanced profile

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.2 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Quality at 8.5) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:2.8<4.5, DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK, 8K_SERIOUS:2.05) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 2.49 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Quality at 8.5, Catalyst at 7.2, and Sentiment at 7.1; the weakest are Momentum at 2.8, Growth at 2.8, and Peer rank at 3.3. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 2.49 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1The business earns approximately 20% operating margins, converts free cash flow at 136% of net income, and possesses a wide economic moat — a combination of durable competitive advantage and strong cash generation that underpins the premium the market attaches to the stock.

    Trip ifOperating margin falls below 15% for 2 consecutive quarters, signaling quality deterioration.

  • P2The company has beaten consensus EPS estimates in all four of the last four quarters, with an average positive surprise of approximately 12%, suggesting a pattern of consistently under-promising and over-delivering.

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters, breaking the beat streak.

  • P3The stock is trading below its 200-day moving average with the average declining at -6.2% per 30 days, and a death cross has formed — a technical configuration that historically increases near-term downside risk and can extend selling pressure even for fundamentally strong businesses.

    Trip ifPrice sustains above the 200-day moving average for more than 30 consecutive days.

  • P4At a forward P/E of roughly 24x and a PEG ratio of 1.77, the valuation assumes above-average future growth, yet both revenue and earnings growth are currently soft — a mismatch the market will resolve either by the business growing into the multiple or by re-rating the stock lower.

    Trip ifEPS grows more than 15% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters, validating the growth premium embedded in the multiple.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks MANH Why this verdict