Skip to main content
COKECoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.Sell5.9·$176.94-0.34%
COKE · Why this verdict

Why Coca-Cola Consolidated (COKE) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.9/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

At roughly 4.8 times forward earnings with a PEG ratio near zero and a recent three-of-four earnings beat history, the business is meaningfully undervalued on fundamentals, but near-term price appreciation is tightly capped—just 2.6% headroom to the resistance target and an unfavorable risk/reward geometry—while an overwhelming single-supplier relationship limits strategic independence.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Shares trade at approximately 4.8 times forward earnings with a PEG ratio near zero, reflecting a valuation that screens well below the sector median and implies the market has not yet credited the earnings stream the business is generating.

Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
The forward multiple expands materially toward the peer median over the next four quarters, driven by sustained earnings delivery and a re-rating of the distribution franchise.

CounterA structurally low multiple can persist in a capital-intensive distribution business with limited pricing autonomy; without a clear catalyst, the discount may be permanent rather than a mispricing.

With approximately 85% of volume dependent on a single upstream supplier, the business operates with limited pricing leverage, material contract renewal risk, and little room to diversify its portfolio or margins independently.

Stable
Bear case
Expectation
If concentration risk eases, gross margin should improve and product diversity should increase—any contract amendment or portfolio diversification announcement would be a leading indicator.

CounterA deeply embedded distribution relationship with a leading global beverage company can also be a durable competitive position; the concentration becomes a liability only if the supplier changes terms unfavorably.

Three of the last four reported quarters produced positive EPS surprises, with an average beat of nearly 17%, suggesting management guides conservatively and regularly delivers results above street expectations.

Stable
Earnings
Expectation
The beat rate remains at 3 of 4 or better over the next four quarters, with average positive surprises exceeding 10%.

CounterThe one miss in the recent history was a meaningful 11% shortfall, and any narrowing of the guidance cushion as analyst estimates catch up to actual delivery would reduce the reliable outperformance margin.

At just 2.6% below the near-term resistance target of $190.33, upside is nearly exhausted and the risk/reward sits at roughly 0.37-to-1 in the bear's favor—a geometry that does not justify initiating or adding capital at current levels.

Stable
Price targets
Expectation
A catalyst-driven break above $190.33 with sustained volume would reset the technical range and restore a more attractive entry setup.

CounterA stock trading close to resistance with strong underlying fundamentals can clear that level quickly on a positive catalyst; thin headline upside to a resistance target is not a permanent price ceiling.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

9.3/10data confidence 83%
ComponentSub-score
P/E5.2
P/S9.3
EV/EBITDA10.0
Fwd P/E10.0
PEG10.0
  • Forward P/E: 4.6x
  • PEG: 0.02
  • Attractively valued

Quality

6.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE10.0
ROA8.5
Gross margin3.9
Op margin3.0
Net margin3.9
Current ratio4.7
FCF quality6.6
Moat6.1
Piotroski F7.8
  • Excellent ROE: 135%
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9

Growth

7.3/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth4.6
EPS growth10.0

Momentum

2.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.5
MACD0.0
OBV1.0
MA position4.0
Volume0.0
  • Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

5.0/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
erm sentiment5.0

Insider

5.0/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.1
  • No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

3.9/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank5.7
quality rank5.4
growth rank4.6
  • Superior ROE vs peers

Technical

6.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger6.5
support resistance6.9
52w position6.1

Risk (lower is worse)

4.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest6.5
days to cover6.5
volatility2.5
put call0.0
implied vol6.0
max pain risk3.0
beta9.7
debt equity3.0
  • Elevated put/call: 2.21
  • Above max pain $140
  • Concentration risks: 1 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

6.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history6.7
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg10.0
dividend safety7.0
  • Strong earnings: 3B/1M
  • Dividend: 56.0%

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (6)
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:34d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • MOMENTUM:2.1<4.5
Warning (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:UPSIDE_EXHAUSTED (upside=0.0%)
Reward-to-Risk
0.00
Upside
+0.0%
Downside
8.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRANGE_BOUND RSI 56 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityMODERATE Balanced profile

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.9 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 9.3) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:2.1<4.5) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.00 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.3, Growth at 7.3, and Catalyst at 6.7; the weakest are Momentum at 2.1, Peer rank at 3.9, and Risk (lower is worse) at 4.7. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Shares trade at approximately 4.8 times forward earnings with a PEG ratio near zero, reflecting a valuation that screens well below the sector median and implies the market has not yet credited the earnings stream the business is generating.

    Trip ifForward P/E rises above 10x for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating the valuation discount has been recognized and the cheap-entry premise no longer applies.

  • P2Three of the last four reported quarters produced positive EPS surprises, with an average beat of nearly 17%, suggesting management guides conservatively and regularly delivers results above street expectations.

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P3With approximately 85% of volume dependent on a single upstream supplier, the business operates with limited pricing leverage, material contract renewal risk, and little room to diversify its portfolio or margins independently.

    Trip ifSupplier concentration falls below 70% of total volume as the company diversifies its distribution sourcing agreements.

  • P4At just 2.6% below the near-term resistance target of $190.33, upside is nearly exhausted and the risk/reward sits at roughly 0.37-to-1 in the bear's favor—a geometry that does not justify initiating or adding capital at current levels.

    Trip ifPrice closes above $190.33 and holds for 5 consecutive trading days, establishing a new technical floor and resetting the upside geometry.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks COKE Why this verdict