Value
5.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 2.7 |
| P/S | 8.3 |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 4.2 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 28.8x
- ▸PEG: 0.47
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Strong financial health — a perfect Piotroski score of 9 and free cash flow at 136% of net income — provides a quality foundation, but two consecutive recent earnings misses, downward estimate revisions, negative price momentum, and risk/reward geometry that falls below the minimum asymmetry threshold combine to make this an unfavorable near-term setup.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Momentum has fallen below the minimum threshold at 3.1, with the stock trading under the 200-day moving average — a technical deterioration that has blocked the entry gate, though the long-term average is still marginally rising. Momentum breakdown | If momentum recovers, price should close above the 200-day moving average and RSI should rise above 55 within two quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterThe 200-day moving average is still rising at approximately 0.5% per month — consistent with a temporary pullback within an underlying uptrend rather than a confirmed breakdown, meaning the technical weakness may self-resolve. | ||
The two most recent quarters both missed consensus — first a shortfall of 4.8%, then the quarter prior a shortfall of 7.0% — reversing what had been a strong beat streak and signaling deterioration in near-term execution. Earnings | If this trend reverses, the next two quarters should each produce EPS beats of more than 5%, indicating the shortfall was temporary. | →Stable |
| CounterThe two quarters prior to the recent misses produced beats of 17% and 49%, demonstrating execution capacity remains; the current misses may reflect near-term estimate calibration rather than a fundamental step-down. | ||
The analyst consensus target has been reached while estimates are trending downward, leaving the risk/reward at a 1.3-to-1 ratio — favorable in direction but below the minimum asymmetry threshold required for a new entry; roughly 8% of headroom exists only to a technical resistance level, not analyst upside. Bear case | If this resolves, analyst consensus should expand to provide more than 15% upside from the current price, restoring a compelling entry geometry. | →Stable |
| CounterTechnical resistance at $313 is approximately 8% above current prices; if the stock clears that level with volume, the price target framework could reset materially higher, unlocking a more favorable entry. | ||
A perfect Piotroski financial health score of 9 out of 9 and free cash flow at 136% of net income provide a solid fundamental floor, suggesting the business remains financially sound despite the recent earnings shortfalls. Quality breakdown | Piotroski score remains at 9 and FCF stays above net income for the next four quarters, affirming financial discipline even as earnings recover. | →Stable |
| CounterTwo consecutive misses with estimates trending down suggest the fundamental picture may be softening; if the miss pattern continues, Piotroski components tied to earnings quality could begin to weaken. | ||
CounterThe 200-day moving average is still rising at approximately 0.5% per month — consistent with a temporary pullback within an underlying uptrend rather than a confirmed breakdown, meaning the technical weakness may self-resolve.
CounterThe two quarters prior to the recent misses produced beats of 17% and 49%, demonstrating execution capacity remains; the current misses may reflect near-term estimate calibration rather than a fundamental step-down.
CounterTechnical resistance at $313 is approximately 8% above current prices; if the stock clears that level with volume, the price target framework could reset materially higher, unlocking a more favorable entry.
CounterTwo consecutive misses with estimates trending down suggest the fundamental picture may be softening; if the miss pattern continues, Piotroski components tied to earnings quality could begin to weaken.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 2.7 |
| P/S | 8.3 |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 4.2 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.8 |
| ROA | 1.2 |
| Gross margin | 6.4 |
| Op margin | 2.3 |
| Net margin | 3.3 |
| Current ratio | 9.8 |
| FCF quality | 9.5 |
| Moat | 6.8 |
| Piotroski F | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.8 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.2 |
| Volume | 0.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 5.3 |
| erm sentiment | 3.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.5 |
| quality rank | 3.7 |
| growth rank | 1.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 5.5 |
| support resistance | 5.7 |
| 52w position | 7.0 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 10.0 |
| volatility | 4.1 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 4.5 |
| max pain risk | 5.0 |
| beta | 6.7 |
| debt equity | 9.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 2.5 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 9.3 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLnone
SetupRANGE_BOUND — RSI 40 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityMODERATE — Balanced profile
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.9 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Risk (lower is worse) at 7.1) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:2.1<4.5, ASYMMETRY:-1.5=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.54 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 7.1, Growth at 6.4, and Technical at 5.8; the weakest are Peer rank at 2.1, Momentum at 2.1, and Sentiment at 4.8. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.54 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifEPS beats consensus by more than 5% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises to more than 15% above the current stock price.
Trip ifPiotroski score falls below 7 or FCF/NI ratio drops below 80% for 2 consecutive reporting periods.
Trip ifPrice closes above the 200-day moving average for 10 consecutive trading sessions and RSI rises above 55.