Skip to main content
BIOBio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.Sell4.9·$291.18+3.97%
BIO · Why this verdict

Why Bio-Rad Laboratories (BIO) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score4.9/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Strong financial health — a perfect Piotroski score of 9 and free cash flow at 136% of net income — provides a quality foundation, but two consecutive recent earnings misses, downward estimate revisions, negative price momentum, and risk/reward geometry that falls below the minimum asymmetry threshold combine to make this an unfavorable near-term setup.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Momentum has fallen below the minimum threshold at 3.1, with the stock trading under the 200-day moving average — a technical deterioration that has blocked the entry gate, though the long-term average is still marginally rising.

Stable
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
If momentum recovers, price should close above the 200-day moving average and RSI should rise above 55 within two quarters.

CounterThe 200-day moving average is still rising at approximately 0.5% per month — consistent with a temporary pullback within an underlying uptrend rather than a confirmed breakdown, meaning the technical weakness may self-resolve.

The two most recent quarters both missed consensus — first a shortfall of 4.8%, then the quarter prior a shortfall of 7.0% — reversing what had been a strong beat streak and signaling deterioration in near-term execution.

Stable
Earnings
Expectation
If this trend reverses, the next two quarters should each produce EPS beats of more than 5%, indicating the shortfall was temporary.

CounterThe two quarters prior to the recent misses produced beats of 17% and 49%, demonstrating execution capacity remains; the current misses may reflect near-term estimate calibration rather than a fundamental step-down.

The analyst consensus target has been reached while estimates are trending downward, leaving the risk/reward at a 1.3-to-1 ratio — favorable in direction but below the minimum asymmetry threshold required for a new entry; roughly 8% of headroom exists only to a technical resistance level, not analyst upside.

Stable
Bear case
Expectation
If this resolves, analyst consensus should expand to provide more than 15% upside from the current price, restoring a compelling entry geometry.

CounterTechnical resistance at $313 is approximately 8% above current prices; if the stock clears that level with volume, the price target framework could reset materially higher, unlocking a more favorable entry.

A perfect Piotroski financial health score of 9 out of 9 and free cash flow at 136% of net income provide a solid fundamental floor, suggesting the business remains financially sound despite the recent earnings shortfalls.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Piotroski score remains at 9 and FCF stays above net income for the next four quarters, affirming financial discipline even as earnings recover.

CounterTwo consecutive misses with estimates trending down suggest the fundamental picture may be softening; if the miss pattern continues, Piotroski components tied to earnings quality could begin to weaken.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

5.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E2.7
P/S8.3
EV/EBITDA2.1
Fwd P/E4.2
PEG10.0
Analyst target3.0
  • Forward P/E: 28.8x
  • PEG: 0.47

Quality

5.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE0.8
ROA1.2
Gross margin6.4
Op margin2.3
Net margin3.3
Current ratio9.8
FCF quality9.5
Moat6.8
Piotroski F10.0
  • Excellent cash conversion: 136% FCF/NI
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 9/9

Growth

6.4/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth2.8
EPS growth10.0

Momentum

2.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.5
MACD0.0
OBV1.0
MA position4.2
Volume0.7
  • Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • Below 200-MA but MA still rising (+0.4%/30d) — pullback in uptrend, not confirmed weakness

Sentiment

4.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target5.3
erm sentiment3.9

Insider

5.0/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.1
  • Negligible insider selling — $135,597 (0.002% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

2.1/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank3.5
quality rank3.7
growth rank1.3

Technical

5.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger5.5
support resistance5.7
52w position7.0
gap5.0

Risk (lower is worse)

7.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest10.0
volatility4.1
put call10.0
implied vol4.5
max pain risk5.0
beta6.7
debt equity9.2

Catalyst

5.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm2.5
earnings history3.3
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg9.3
  • Earnings concerns: 2B/2M

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (6)
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:35d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • MOMENTUM:2.1<4.5
  • ASYMMETRY:-1.5=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-1.54
Upside
-11.3%
Downside
7.4%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRANGE_BOUND RSI 40 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityMODERATE Balanced profile

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.9 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Risk (lower is worse) at 7.1) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:2.1<4.5, ASYMMETRY:-1.5=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.54 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 7.1, Growth at 6.4, and Technical at 5.8; the weakest are Peer rank at 2.1, Momentum at 2.1, and Sentiment at 4.8. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.54 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1The two most recent quarters both missed consensus — first a shortfall of 4.8%, then the quarter prior a shortfall of 7.0% — reversing what had been a strong beat streak and signaling deterioration in near-term execution.

    Trip ifEPS beats consensus by more than 5% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2The analyst consensus target has been reached while estimates are trending downward, leaving the risk/reward at a 1.3-to-1 ratio — favorable in direction but below the minimum asymmetry threshold required for a new entry; roughly 8% of headroom exists only to a technical resistance level, not analyst upside.

    Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises to more than 15% above the current stock price.

  • P3A perfect Piotroski financial health score of 9 out of 9 and free cash flow at 136% of net income provide a solid fundamental floor, suggesting the business remains financially sound despite the recent earnings shortfalls.

    Trip ifPiotroski score falls below 7 or FCF/NI ratio drops below 80% for 2 consecutive reporting periods.

  • P4Momentum has fallen below the minimum threshold at 3.1, with the stock trading under the 200-day moving average — a technical deterioration that has blocked the entry gate, though the long-term average is still marginally rising.

    Trip ifPrice closes above the 200-day moving average for 10 consecutive trading sessions and RSI rises above 55.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks BIO Why this verdict