Celtic Bank and Lead Bank
“10-K Item 1A: 'We currently rely on Celtic Bank and Lead Bank to originate substantially all of the loans facilitated through our platform'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Affirm Holdings discloses is Celtic Bank and Lead Bank, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Affirm Holdings’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1A: 'We currently rely on Celtic Bank and Lead Bank to originate substantially all of the loans facilitated through our platform'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'a single issuing bank partner, Evolve Bank & Trust ("Card Issuing Bank"), to issue the Affirm Card'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'our significant commercial partner relationships, such as with Amazon or Shopify, due to a lapse in exclusivity or otherwise, would adversely affect our business'”
Affirm carries three disclosed concentrations — two high-share banking partner dependencies and one moderate commercial platform dependency — that together define a business model reliant on a small number of critical third-party relationships for both its core loan origination and its card product. On the origination side, the company currently relies on Celtic Bank and Lead Bank to originate substantially all of the loans facilitated through its platform. This is a large dependency by disclosed size and idiosyncratic in character: substantially all origination flowing through two bank partners means that a regulatory action against, operational disruption at, or exit by either institution could impair the company's ability to facilitate transactions platform-wide. The dependency exists because Affirm is not itself a bank, making originating partners a structural necessity — but the concentration in just two institutions leaves limited redundancy. For the Affirm Card specifically, Evolve Bank & Trust is the sole issuing bank partner — another large, idiosyncratic dependency. A single card issuer means any issue with Evolve's operations, licensing, or willingness to continue the relationship would directly affect the card product's availability. On the merchant side, the filing flags relationships with significant commercial partners such as Amazon or Shopify as a moderate exposure, noting that a lapse in exclusivity or other disruption to these relationships would adversely affect the business. This is a dependency tied to specific commercial agreements rather than the structural composition of the end-market. The three exposures reinforce each other at different layers of the value chain — origination, card issuance, and merchant distribution — making the stability of each individual relationship a distinct watch variable.
For the engine’s reasoning on AFRM’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGM | Federal Agricultural Mortgage C | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| AGM-A | Federal Agricultural Mortgage C | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| AFRM● | Affirm Holdings, Inc. | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| AXP | American Express Company | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| BFH | Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| ALLY | Ally Financial Inc. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.